For over twenty years, the Redwall series—fantasy novels featuring anthropomorphic animals—has been on the shelves, and has entertained generations of readers. And you gotta admit—badgers and rats and otters and monitor lizards and hares and wildcats (et cetera) making war on each other with a variety of weapons is very cool. %-)
British author Brian Jacques originally wrote Redwall for the children at the Royal Wavertree School for the Blind in Liverpool. His descriptive style catered to his first audience; Jacques wished to paint words for his listeners so they could see his stories unfold. When his former English teacher read Redwall, and sent it to a publisher without Jacques’ knowledge, Jacques received a contract to write the first five books in the series. Ever since, the tales of Redwall have been published and read all around the world.
Redwall has been made into an animated TV series (Redwall: Season One), a stage musical (The Redwall Opera), a graphic novel (Redwall: The Graphic Novel), dramatized audio books (such as Mariel of Redwall), and there have been numerous spin offs of the series, including the Tribes of Redwall booklets, the Redwall Map and Riddler, the Redwall Cookbook, Songs from Redwall, and several gorgeously illustrated pictures books such as The Great Redwall Feast, and A Redwall Winter Tale. The series has been published in over fourteen languages, has routinely made the national bestseller lists.
Mr. Jacques is also the author of several short story collections (Seven Strange and Ghostly Tales and The Ribbajack) and his Castaways series (Castaways of the Flying Dutchman, The Angel's Command and Voyage of Slaves).

There's a lot of information about everything Redwall related at the official site, Redwall Abbey.
The series includes:
Redwall (A young mouse goes from bumbling novice to hero while he fights to save his home. Bonus: snakes!)
Mossflower (Classic rebel alliance against evil empire, and stars Martin the Warrior. Bonus: Mask, one of the coolest otters in the series.)
Mattimeo (The direct sequel to Redwall--all the kids at Redwall are kidnapped by a masked fox who's seeking revenge on Matthias. Bonus: an underground kingdom collapses and EXPLODES. Can we say cool?)
Mariel of Redwall (Here there be pirates, arrrg. Mariel sets out to avenge her father and kill the pirate king, Gabool the Wild. Bonus: Insane pirates.)

Salamandastron (Salamandastron is besieged by the army of the blue-eyed assassin weasel warlord and his son. A personal favorite. Bonus: Assassins. Wait, I already said that... okay, plague!)
Martin the Warrior (The story behind Martin's past and his PTSD. Bonus: cannibal lizards AND the pirate stoat Clogg.)
The Bellmaker (Mariel and her boyfriend get into trouble with the local fox warlords; Joseph the Bellmaker comes to aid her. Bonus: a maelstrom and ships get crunched.)

The Outcast of Redwall (A baby ferret abandoned outside Redwall is adopted and raised by one of the Abbeymice--until he's outcast for his crimes. Another personal favorite. Bonus: You mean aside from Veil?)
The Pearls of Lutra (A Legolas-wannabe otter chick seeks revenge for the slaughter of her holt, which was destroyed for six exotic pearls. This one has the monitor lizards and a pine marten who does hypnosis. Bonus: poisonous sea snakes.)
The Long Patrol (A young hare runs away to join the famed Long Patrol and much battling ensues. Bonus: badgers jumping off cliffs! (Again!))
Marlfox (The tapestry of Martian is kidnapped--again--and it's up to a band of young Redwallers to track down the Marlfoxes who stole it. Bonus: pwetty foxes.)

The Legend of Luke (What really happened to Martin the Warrior's father... and no, he didn't get sidetracked to Vegas. Bonus: everybody dies. Almost.)
Lord Brocktree (The origins of stuff at Salamandastron. Sorta. Bonus: Blue vermin. No, seriously, they're all dyed blue.)
Taggerung (An otter raised by vermin seeks his true family. The book that had some of the most shiny potential was a huge, huge disappointment. Bonus: Roagan Boar (a fox). The adjective "drool-worthy" comes to mind.)
Triss (A squirrel chick wants revenge. Merc sets her hair on fire for even reading this--IMO, it's one of the worst books in the series. Bonus: the pirate fox Plugg.)
Loamhedge (Redwallers go on a Quest. There are Riddles. People Die. Next. Bonus: ???)

Rakkety Tam (A mercenary squirrel seeks an escape from an oath he made, and comes to Redwall. This one features a wolverine as the antagonist, and the book was a little better than the previous few. Bonus: mercenary highlander squirrels.)
High Rhulain (More otters. More quests. Look, a feast at Redwall. Didn't see that coming, did you? Bonus: ???)
Eulalia! (Exactly what the title says. Badgers and hares run around whooping war cries and seeking Vengeance. Bonus: ????)

I must admit a certain fondness and sense of nostalgia for this series (don’t look at me like that; I’m older than I look, in demon years anyway). I grew up reading the novels and it was the world of Redwall that sparked my love of anthrofiction and furry stories ever since.
And it's true, I still do like a handful of the older books. Salamandastron, The Outcast of Redwall, and Mossflower,, for example. But the series--the world--as a whole has several Issues.
WHAT I LIKE
This is the kind of anthrofiction I love. Swashbuckling adventure, pirates, monsters, battles, and all done with fuzzy critters.
There are some characters in the series I like and care about, there are some great battle scenes, and while not always bloody, there is a good deal of gore on occasion. %-) Jacques' has a masterful grasp of language and he can paint gorgeous pictures with words.
There is also a fair amount of humor in many of the books. I mentioned the pirates, and it's because they are some of the most fun characters. ;) Cliched, true, and typically vermin (there are exceptions--rare though they are--just as there are the occasional exception to the Woodlander Rule [see below]) but some of them are just so over the top and brazen they're immediately likable. For example, Cap'n Tremmun Clogg (a stoat, from Martin the Warrior) and Cap'n Plugg Firetail (a fox—the only good thing in Triss).

The illustrations in the later books have been quite good, with detailed pen and ink illustrations to head each chapter and I love many of the covers (in both the US and UK editions--a note that the pictures here feature both UK and US editions).
The books have rich description, a strong vocabulary, and generally the plots—while nothing overly complex—at least build from beginning, middle, to end. The earlier books, at least, have had strong climaxes.
While perhaps the characters are more human than animalisitic in personalities and nature, the characteristics of the species do show through (if, perhaps, in predictable ways: otters are the good swimmers, squirrels are the climbers, moles are the diggers, hares are the runners, etc).
Though I personally am not found of the accents and dialects that 90% of the cast has, I do give Mr. Jacques points for coming up with a wide variety of dialects and more or less sticking with them. There's mole-speak (good luck), sparra (sparrow dialect), hare dialects, otter slang, vermin horrific speech patterns (one word: ugh), etc. It's easier to listen to, IMO, but the various speech patterns (littering the pages with apostrophes though they do) are part of the world and give it a sense of depth on occasion.
The coolest thing about the Redwall series has always been, for me at least, the weapons and warfare. I love the imagery of animals wielding pikes and scimitars and bows and claymores, and duking it out with each other.

While Jacques does use an omni-POV quite often, I find that it works well most of the time. I'm not found of it, but he has the skill to pull it off smoothly--he is a natural storyteller, and it shows in his writing.
WHAT I DON'T LIKE
Perhaps my biggest issue is that of species affiliation. The basic Law of Redwall is:
Woodlanders = Good
Vermin = Evil
("Woodlanders" being mice, hares, moles, squirrels, most birds, otters, badgers, voles, shrews, etc. "Vermin" are the rats, weasels, ferrets, wildcats, martens, all reptiles and amphibians, foxes, wolverines, etc.)
The worldview is black and white that's rarely touched with gray. What bugs me so much about this is that it MAKES NO SENSE. The species are good or bad because that's how they are born, apparently. *Merc sets Redwall's philosophy on fire*
Take Taggerung for example. The premise is that an otter is raised by a tribe of vermin. When I first read the blurb for the novel, I was excited beyonds words--I hoped SO much that we'd get an evil otter. (There's a borderline psychopathic otter in The Legend of Luke if I recall correctly, but this is different.)
Instead, Tagg is the epitome of Good. He may as well never have HEARD of murder, treachery, backstabbing, thievery, torture, slavery, wanton destruction, and abuse that everyone around him wallows in on a daily basis. ARGH.

This is the main flaw in the world. If you see a rat, you can assume that there's a 99.9999999% chance it will be Evil, probably have an ungodly accent, have a negative IQ and generally be the most useless thing around. (Warlords are the exception--they tend to be insane and smarter than the grunts, but that's it.)
Whereas you see a mouse, and there's about a 100% chance it will be Good (and good luck with the chances it will have, you know, flaws).
There have been some exceptions, yes. Veil's end choice (The Outcast of Redwall) is ambiguous--personally I think he turned back to the "light" at the end. ;) There are some good corsairs (such as Romosca in The Pearls of Lutra [please correct me if I misspell a name, or attribute characters to the wrong book--it's been awhile since I've read them all]) and some bad shrews. There's an occasional good rat and the odd bad squirrel.
But these are as rare as, hmmmm, Moby Dick. How many white whales show up every day? Yes, they're out there but they aren't the norm.
Aside from that, the books have become fomulatic. There is ALWAYS a riddle quest, a physical quest of some kind, a feast (sorry, but reading about food is NOT interesting--and especially not multiple times for pages at a time in EACH BOOK), and in the chronologically later books, Martin's sword (and spirit) are a staple.
The actual plots are recycled too often for my tastes now: some Evil Horde wants to take over or destroy Redwall (ain't gonna happen); ditto the EH attacking Salamandastron... or some variant of an assault on one of those two places. Or else there is a quest to free a Oppressed Woodland Representation (i.e. the rebellion vs the empire plot).
The earlier books had some distinct characters and antagonists. I've noticed one thing in the later books is that if the entire cast doesn't tick me off for being goody-two-paws, complete idiots, dibbuns [kids] that need to be strangled, pointless evil bullying "vermin, or is a hare, then they are forgettable.
All the Redwallers eventually blur into one homogeneous mass of Good, the vermin are all the same (except for the occasional pirate), and you may as well just call all the hares and badgers by the same name for the amount of variety we see in them. (I do admit the hares are probably the species with the most variance of personality, despite there being only different levels of how much they annoy me. Badgers--well, seen one in the Bloodwrath, seen 'em all.)
I haven't read the latest two books or Loamhedge because, to me, there's nothing special, new or memorable about the books anymore. It's one of those series that needs to be allowed to END.

IN CONCLUSION
I still do recommend the older books (go by publishing order, not chronological order), if you like animal fantasy and are looking for a good romp. The Redwall Series is an enjoyable anthro fantasy world, and while it does have it's flaws, a few books still stand out as being highly enjoyable reads that hold up to second and third reading.
While I do think the series needs to be allowed to come to a close, it's a pillar in modern day anthro fantasy and is well worth checking out if this is the kind of fiction you like.
~Merc


14 comments:
No, seriously. They're all dyed blue.
*cracks up* Somehow I forgot that bit.
Man, I loved Marlfox. Loved it. Entirely for the foxes--I can't remember anything at all about the Good characters. Clearly I was destined early for the dark side.
(the poisoning scene was--wow, I still remember the thrill of that. Foxes! Deadly family intrigue! Bluffing with deadly poison! With one's own mother!
. . . it's kind of interesting to look back and see how early I started these narrative kinks. 'Cause Zelazny's chronicles of Amber, one of my favorite series? Is all about the deadly family intrigue and bluffing one another with poison/armies/deadly-primal-forces-underlying-reality. And protagonists who might charitably be called dark grey.)
Lol - I loved Redwall when I was a kid, but stopped reading it a few years ago. I think I just grew out of it personally and as you say, the storylines all became a little samey towards the end.
Thanks for the great (and hilarious) review! Makes me wanna go back and read them again now.
"I haven't read the latest two books or Loamhedge because there's nothing special, new or memorable about the books any more. It's one of those series that needs to be allowed to END."
Then perhaps you're missing out on some grey characters.
You may also be interested in the Redwall Wiki, http://redwall.wikia.com
*facepalm* Gah, sorry about all the typos, folks. My brain was elsewhere and I forgot to proofread before posting. :$ My bad. I'll clean it up in a bit.
Thanks for the link, Anon. And I might be tempted to read if I had some assurance there was something, well, worth reading in the last few books. ;)
I've got a huge TBR pile and I feel like I've seen everything Mr. Jacques has to offer in the Redwall 'verse. If anyone's read the last few books and finds something shiny, let me know, because I'll even just read selectively if there's the promise of something fun and Merc-ish.
~Merc
Hey, what an amazing review - you took me right back down memory lane!
Thanks, Smoking Gnu! :D Glad to have you visit the TS.
~Merc
great write up about the series
thanks
Haah! I like reading your article a lot. Especially the food part. All Redwall books that I have read so far always have a great cook and a long list of food and long talk about food. But the food itself is outlandish that I can't even imagine what they would taste like.
I agree with you on a lot of positions. I had several of the books already: Redwall, Mossflower, Salamandastron, The Bell Maker, The outcast of Redwall, Mathemio and Martin the Warior.
After reading those I slowly loose my interested until my interest totaly disappears. Plot is recycled most of the time. Redwall and Salamandastron has almost the same plot but with different characters and setting: conquest, A villainous horde of vermin tried to take over their beloved place( Redwall in Redwall, Salamandastron in Salamandastron). This plot is also used in The Bell Maker, and Mathemio and some variation in the others. There is also this quest plot where one of the Redwallers venture outside, typically, to retrieve something (like Martin's sword in Redwall, the children in Mathemio and Veil in The Outast of Redwall).
The enemies also does not have much advantage in any ways, and, if they have, it was surely to be mysteriously butted in some ways (by accidents typically, like when Cornflower drop her lantern to the ladder the vermin are using to climb over the walls of Redwall).
I also does not like the way Brian makes the heroes win. Even if they are outnumbered, the heroes will just make it out with just a few scratches and loss of numbers while the enemies is sure to have most of their number dead. The usual excuse is that our heroes are so skillful they could almost take out the enemy horde alone.
The characters are also black and white. They are either bad or good, nothing is in between. Even Veil, in The Outcast of Redwall, is concluded evil in the end even if he grows in company of good beings and from what you say Taggerung that grows up good even if it grows up in a world where killing others is a norm.
The evil horde that tries to take over is always similar in structure: A brainy, treacherous leader that is hampered by his or her stupid, cowardly army (that the woodlanders always manage to trick). If the horde had qualified or skillful members, those always died before their talents are of use. Meanwhile our good citizens are always courageous, intelligent and resourceful. Almost everyone is talented and qualified warriors. Sometimes they also have outstanding members (like Mask the otter). They always die, but, unlike the evil horde, these talented creatures does not die until they had contributed something worthwhile.
And in terms of moral and learning. It almost have none. It is purely escape and there is nothing to learn from it whatsoever.
I would never buy one from the series again. Experience tells me not to anymore, if the series continues as it is. I really love to have stories aside from war from these characters. Maybe just some quite ordinary ones for a change.
Heh, thanks for the comments, Rover! Glad the article entertained. ;)
Yes, sadly the books haven't improved. I haven't checked out the latest couple at all...
Thanks for reading!
This is very like my own thoughts on the series.
I've loved it since I first picked it up about 12 years ago, but my complaints are pretty much the same - first: that the good/evil boundary is too simplistic (a sad casualty of the audience Jacques chooses to write for), and second: that the newer books get harder and harder to get through while I continually reread the older ones for pleasure.
Another problem in the newer books besides the "samey" plots has been the ever-decreasing vermin IQ. This makes them even less of a threat and more of a pitiable nuisance... almost like clown characters instead of legitimate bad guys. The whole thing with Plugg Firetail and his lost tail was like something out of a Monty Python skit, except it wasn't that funny and I think I was actually supposed to take him more seriously.
My favorites in the series are all found in the earlier half, Mossflower topping the list. I'd say it's primarily for the awesomeness that is Mask. I love the otters in general, but Mask is just so different in a series that tends to be populated by stock characters... he's just dang cool, is all. Salamandastron and Martin the Warrior are also high up on my list. Outcast too, though for some inexplicable reason I thought the first three chapters were some of the worst writing I've seen out of Mr. Jacques.
I do plan to read the two most recent books when I get the time and opportunity, but these days I do it just for the little gems. Things like references to older tales I know and love, a character that might stand out for being different or just plain cool, if not original. I just skim over the riddles and feasts; probably nothing new there. I only assume this obsession with delicious food came out of the author being raised in England in WWII.
Of course I still hold out hope that the series could hit its groove again and come out with something truly awesome. After all, Taggerung was almost close (and I tend to like the book more for its potential than for what it actually was)... I'm not holding my breath, but it'd sure be nice.
My absolute favorite would be for the woodlanders to actually lose, even if the next book had them rise up and reconquer Redwall or whatever. Or for both sides to fare so badly in the final battle that nobody can claim victory, though that's probably too depressing for its audience. Or for more gray characters or moral why-are-we-fighting-anyway questions... ah well.
And I'd definitely avoid Loamhedge. The title leads you to believe that it might feature the mice that lived there before the sickness drove them out, or something awesome besides... nah. Just a quest to the ruins, while pathetic vermin bands try to throw themselves at Redwall. A quest (as I realized when trying to summarize the book for a friend) that not only cost lives but ultimately served no purpose, as the problem "back home" resolved itself. *facepalm*
Though for all my complaints, I do love the series. Love the world, love the concept, love how it makes me want to doodle animals making war with weapons. I just tend to be very critical of the things I like, especially when the newer offerings just don't hold up (admittedly to my maturing tastes).
Rachel, thanks so much for the great comments! I enjoyed your views on it--and yes, it does make me want to doodle too, despite my abysmal drawing skills. :P
I would like to keep up hope that perhaps the series could hit its old groove, but am afraid I don't even pay attention to the new books now I wouldn't know. ;) Unless, of course, someone comes running up to me and exclaims, "Dude, Redwallers lost in this book!"
Hey, a girl can dream, yah? O:)
~Merc
Good post. I've been looking all day for anyone who'll say anything at all against Redwall. Here's what I wrote on Goodreads:
I was looking forward to the Redwall series, because I don't mind light fantasy and there are a lot of them in the series. However I was sadly disappointed by this first book and won't be reading any more.
My problem is that it's not clear whether the characters are animals or humans. Sure, they're described as animals, but they don't act like that. They live in an abbey (was it built by humans or animals? what scale is it on?) and act somewhat like monks (except for the bit about pra...more I was looking forward to the Redwall series, because I don't mind light fantasy and there are a lot of them in the series. However I was sadly disappointed by this first book and won't be reading any more.
My problem is that it's not clear whether the characters are animals or humans. Sure, they're described as animals, but they don't act like that. They live in an abbey (was it built by humans or animals? what scale is it on?) and act somewhat like monks (except for the bit about prayers, or any religion at all - they're even less religious than Brother Cadfael). They don't really act like animals at all, and in some cases they act distinctly differently to animals. For example, one of the mice carries several bags of chestnuts - except that chestnuts are about as big as mice. And at one point an owl and a pussycat walk hand-in-hand (technically, paw-in-wing). How do they do that? And how does it make sense?
OK, so the book is not really about animals, it's about people. But as books about people go, the characters are not really like people either. They're sort of animal-shaped people with cartoon emotions and motivations. Everything about them is a cliche.
I read this book at the same time as "Wicked", in which the wicked witch of the West is given a believable and sympathetic back-story. "Wicked" is a book about people, "Watership Down" is a book about animals, "Redwall" is neither. "Redwall" is the same sort of corruption of animals that Disney practises. OK, it's a kid book, maybe I should cut it some slack, but I read Lemony Snicket and the Bartimaeus trilogy and enjoyed all of them much more than "Redwall".
The review was great, I especially agree with the Taggerung. He was way out of character. In his journey, he was polite to people. How can he be polite if he never learned to be? Also, when he got back to Redwall after his operation, he acted like a soft Redwaller, not like the rough-and-tough kind of otter you would have expected him to grow up as.
I really think Jacques should throw his black and white policy out the window and be realistic. Sometime or another, something's going to happen to a person that turns them good to bad or vice versa. You don't always follow the bloodline in goodness or badness (as in the Taggerung).
You might find something interesting in Doomwyte. It's a 'where are Gonff's descendants now?' sort of deal. There's also a really cool otter, but saying any more would be a spoiler.
I guess the reason Redwall isn't improving is that he's running out of original stuff. I read that in the next book, The Sable Quean, there's a mole warrior, but what else can he do?
Actually, it'd be awesome if Redwall was actually taken over and it had a whole repeat of history like Kotir....but repeating history might not be the way to go.
Hey, mxm1117, thanks for stopping by. Yup! Agree with your idea Mr. Jacques should throw out the good/evil rigidity and speciesism--in fact, I think that alone would give him lots more options/material.
Sadly, I doubt it'll happen.
I'll check out Doomwyte sometime, thanks.
Actually, it'd be awesome if Redwall was actually taken over and it had a whole repeat of history like Kotir....but repeating history might not be the way to go. I have to admit, though, if Redwall fell and actually stayed conquered for awhile, I might find some renewed interest. O:)
~Merc
Post a Comment